Alan Dershowitz, a renowned constitutional law expert, has voiced his astonishment at the weak indictment of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case against former President Donald Trump. In an exclusive interview with our correspondent, Dershowitz expressed doubts about the fairness of the trial and its chances for dismissal.
"The prosecutors seem to have delayed this case until December because they know it is weak," stated Dershowitz. He continued to explain that if there were any substantial evidence or argument against Trump, one would expect them not to delay but instead push forward with urgency.
Dershowitz also highlighted that there are four cases currently being used by Democrats and anti-Trump operatives in attempts to prevent him from running for president again. However, he argued that these cases hold little merit when compared directly with Bragg's indictment: "There is nothing here related specifically to those four cases; I believe their aim is solely political."
As a respected authority on legal matters involving US politics and high-profile individuals such as O.J Simpson and Jeffrey Epstein as well as other controversial figures throughout history – including Julian Assange – Mr. Alan Dershowitz carries significant weight within both academic circles and public opinion on broader issues like First Amendment rights.
In shedding light upon what appears increasingly likely during this unfolding situation surrounding ex-President Donald J Trump’s potential re-run towards 2024 elections alongside concurrent investigations into alleged criminal conduct during his time residing over White House operations between January 2017-January 2021 - particularly given recent revelations concerning ongoing civil lawsuits brought forth across New York City courts system following tax fraud allegations targeting former CFO Allen Weisselberg & various family members involved therein - we remain committed toward providing unbiased coverage upon every development taking place around United States federal government institutions today so readers may reach informed conclusions based only facts presented without fear nor favor towards any specific ideology or party affiliation.
In conclusion, constitutional law expert Alan Dershowitz has expressed shock at the weak indictment in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case against former President Trump. He sees little chance of a fair trial or dismissal and believes that prosecutors have delayed the case due to their knowledge of its weaknesses. Furthermore, he dismissed connections between this case and other attempts by Democrats and anti-Trump operatives to prevent another presidential run as purely political in nature.