The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) has filed a federal lawsuit against Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves for signing two controversial bills that expand state control over law enforcement and judicial systems in the predominantly Black city of Jackson. The NAACP argues that these bills represent a regression for the state, infringing on the rights of local residents.
Following last year's water crisis which left tens of thousands without running water, tensions have been mounting between local communities and government officials. The newly signed legislation allows the state-controlled Capitol Police to extend their jurisdiction beyond just state buildings, covering a significantly larger portion of Jackson. This move has sparked outrage among critics who argue it places mostly White conservative state authorities in charge over an 80% Black Democratic city.
In addition to expanded jurisdiction, one bill also establishes an unelected court system within the Capitol Complex Improvement District, including adjacent neighborhoods and businesses. Judges and prosecutors assigned by state-level officials will oversee cases brought forth by Capitol Police officers.
Derrick Johnson, President of the national NAACP stated: "These new laws are not only detrimental to our community but also undermine basic principles like democracy and equal representation."
Republican lawmakers supporting this legislation maintain that such changes are necessary due to growing backlogs in courts as well as rising violence rates throughout Jackson in recent years. State Rep. Mark Baker explained: "We need efficient solutions now more than ever; our aim is not to disenfranchise anyone but rather address pressing issues facing our citizens."
However, many remain skeptical about how effective these measures will be at improving public safety or addressing systemic problems faced by marginalized communities within Jackson.
Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba voiced his concerns saying: “This legislation seeks to take away power from those elected by people while ignoring underlying causes contributing towards crime.”
As tensions continue to rise surrounding this contentious issue, all eyes will be on the federal court's decision concerning these two controversial bills.